Who else could this mental case be but {ME} of [address removed], Victoria, Australia. This is Phil’s third attempt to sue me, all for the same idiotic reason…he doesn’t like me.
Since this blogpost will serve as my reply to the court, I ask the judge if there is not a limit on how many times a mentally incompetent person can sue someone. Surely, the court has wasted enough time with this nonsense that they might consider restraining {ME} from filing these stupid lawsuits.
Yes, I exposed {ME} to ridicule, though not hatred and contempt as he charges. I know I should laugh off all of Phil’s public ridicule of me that he placed on Youtube with his dishonest and idiotic videos, as well as his childish website on which he and his associates bash me and give me awards for “Idiot of the Month”. However, I suspect that the planet contains some people who are equally as stupid as {ME} who might believe some of the nonsense that he publishes about me. So, I certainly have a right to reply to this stupidity and dishonesty in public.
As no mentally competent person can possibly take Phil seriously, his charges that I provoke hatred or contempt for him are ludicrous. People who have IQ’s above the retarded range would normally tend to feel sorry for him. But, Phil is so obnoxious that he makes people laugh at him. He brings that all on himself by pestering people in public like a whining two year old. He has provoked all of the ridicule against himself by me and many other sane people who he attacked on the internet.
It was ruled in an Australian court several years ago that {ME} has a personality disorder, not Asperger’s Syndrome. I think he’s just plain stupid. By definition, Asperger’s is brain damage, as is any condition on the Autistic Spectrum. So, through Phil’s insistence that he has Asperger’s, he is himself confirming that he does indeed suffer from brain damage. Anyone suffering from brain damage fits under the slang term “mental case” so we see that Phil’s contention that I made false statements about him by using those terms is, by his own words, simply not true.
Phil claims that the fact that I stated that he abuses all people on the autistic spectrum is a false statement. Wrong, {ME} does abuse all people on the autistic spectrum by promoting false information about autism. Anyone who is stupid enough to believe what Phil says about the cause and cure for autism risks harming people who suffer from autism. That harm is manifested through negligence due to ignorance which would result in people remaining autistic when they could have been cured if they had known the truth. I don’t think that Phil’s abuse of autistic people here is malicious but is due to his stupidity. So, I would not ask that he be formally charged for abusing disabled people. However, the words he uses are still abuse since not all people who might read his words will know instantly that Phil is presenting false information.
As to Phil’s complaint that I published his unlisted phone number, Phil left a message on my answering machine on which he left me that number, did not advise me that it was unlisted and did not ask me to refrain from publishing it. Thus, he gave me the number, unprovoked, and I’m free to give it to anyone I choose.
Phil is asking an Australian court to rule contrary to the first amendment of the United States Constitution. Neither I, nor any United States citizen will recognize any ruling by any court which violates our right to free speech. If {ME} wants to ridicule me in public, as he has done repeatedly since 2006, I will ridicule him as I see fit. Please advise {ME} to shut up, stop behaving like a whiny child, and stop thinking he can use the court to force people he attacks to refrain from returning the favor.
JOHN BEST JUNIOR as FORESAM
This entry was ruled on January 24, 2013 to be defamatory
*ROTFLMAO*
I got an email as well regarding this and I told him in reply that I’m not his messenger boy. The court isn’t hearing about this from me in the leave application process, because it’s not needed. All I need is the Affidavit from the US Central Authority and that will finish the leave application.
However I will be using this entry in the application for the interlocutory order, because it proves my case against him;
1. This isn’t attempt number three to sue him. It’s the first one ongoing. The second wasn’t against him and it wasn’t a lawsuit anyway. It was Google in VCAT.
2. He’s forgotten that this isn’t about stupidity and dishonesty. This is about defamation. Lying about me and with intent to harm.
3. No mentally competent person has taken Best seriously. That’s why he has his letters to various people ignored, and videos like the one he sent to the CDC deleted. I’m only taking him seriously in this instance because his lies against me are particularly heinous and damaging.
4. No court has “ruled” that I have a personality disorder. AAT did in 1991 (they aren’t a court, remember), but that was well before my Asperger’s DX so it can easily be over ruled as new medical evidence.
5. I can prove easily that what I say about the Spectrum is true and correct – verified in all the Vaccine Court cases in the Autism Omnibus and in Blackwell v Wyeth. Best has no such precedent. I can also use the Quackbusters article on the matters with the references if need be. This will prove without a doubt that Best is the one harming Autistics, and not me.
6. Best was told the number was silent (unlisted) and he still refused to take it down. That is a privacy violation that even the US would recognise.
7. In an Australian Court, the First Amendment does not apply. Once Best is found guilty (by default of appearance) of defaming me I can use that ruling against him. The First Amendment goes out the window when someone is found guilty of defamation.
Best has been told that he has until February 4, 2011 to file an appearance and get involved. I don’t expect him to do so and I expect to get leave to proceed in his absence very quickly. Then it’s just a matter of having the claim assessed both for the take down order and for damages – and hopefully getting the judge to put it in writing that Best is a liar when it comes to the Autistic Spectrum. Once that’s written in legal precedent, no US court – let alone the New Hampshire courts – would support Best’s demands to keep his blogs open.