Change.gov has asked for questions for Obama. They claim they will answer them in the New Year. Please vote here for the following question. Go to the search bar, type in autism and you will find lots of questions. The Neuronitwits are hard at work flagging every suggestion to do with vaccines as a cause of autism as inappropriate, so it would be nice to counter their deranged attempt to harm our children.
“President Bush refused to tell the truth about how thimerosal causes autism.
Will you ban the use of thimerosal and tell the public the truth so we can begin curing all of these children who had their brains damaged by thimerosal in vaccines?”

JOHN BEST JUNIOR as FORESAM

I’ve spread the word to vote this down and when I last checked it was getting the thumbs down as it deserves to.

I received this pile of manure in an email from Dr Rima Laibow in which she tries to deny that she is a disinformation agent working against the best interests of children with autism. This is a lot of bullshit for a simple denial.

The fact remains that Dr Laibow is a lying piece of garbage.


Only a lying piece of garbage could possibly take such a strong stand against me for trying to post one simple link to a blog entry that I wrote advising people that voting for any incumbent politician for President was against their best interests. The worst that could have happened if I had been allowed to post that link on Dr Laibow’s Yahoo group is that a handful of people might have looked at it. There is an even slimmer chance that my blog entry may have convinced anyone to change their mind a month before the election and vote against Obama and McCain.

So, no matter what Dr Laibow says in her defense, this proven liar is not to be believed. Dr Laibow would have us believe that she is looking out for our best interests by doing her thing with Codex Alimentarius to preserve our access to the vitamin supplements we need to help our autistic children. Yet, she adamantly refuses to allow me to post one bit of information that opposes the same politicians who will allow those supplements to be banned. By banning my opposition to those politicians, Dr Laibow, in essence took a stance in favor of banning those supplements and preventing us from curing our children of autism. By such vile action, Dr Rima Laibow advertised to the world that she is a lying scoundrel who is trying to harm our autistic children with her devious misinformation.
Here’s some information on her husband, Gen Stubblebine.


This is the piece that it appears the lying Dr Laibow is responding to:
Why does Dr. Rima Laibow use psychological warfare techniques?
<<< Back to Codex

When Dr. Rima Laibow first suddenly appeared on the anti-Codex landscape as leader of the newly-formed Natural Solutions Foundation, I began to wonder where she was coming from. Although she seemed to have a straightforward, hands-on approach to internet activism, something seemed to be amiss.

Long-term anti-Codex activist John Hammell had clearly identified the transnational treaties such as WTO, FTAA and CAFTA as integrating Codex language, placing jurisdiction outside of U.S. lawmakers. Yet Dr. Laibow not only ignored this connection, but actively dissuaded her growing community of online supporters from paying any attention to it, especially at the time when CAFTA was being debated in Congress and there was a real possibility of defeating it. (More on this dissuasion below.)

Then I learned that Dr. Laibow was suing Kevin Miller, allegedly for her having provided some funding for his brilliant and powerful video on Codex called “We Become Silent” but, apparently against her wishes, his including the connection to the above-mentioned treaties.

Since then she has engaged her online community in what appears to be a good cause – writing and calling Congress to stop BioShield 2, a truly horrific proposed law. But all discussion of Codex appears to be directing people into a useless diversion, writing and sending letters of “support” for an “alternative” to the Codex vitamin guidelines. We as ordinary people have zero impact on this process, since it is being drawn up by bureaucrats in the Codex delegations whose allegiance is primarily to the pharmaceutical industry. So getting people involved in this process is a wholesale waste of time.

Then I looked carefully at a message she sent to her supporters about Codex several months ago. In it I found the use of carefully-chosen psychologically-charged words, a technique used in psychological warfare tracts developed at U.S. Army Intelligence by a man named Edward G. Lansdale. This technique, called the Semantic Differential, has been used by our intelligence services widely, as part of programs to subvert “enemy” countries and other targets. (I first read about the Semantic Differential in a tract in Covert Intelligence Information Bulletin about psychological warfare used against Grenada, Chile, and Nicaragua.)

The Semantic Differential is a technique which uses culturally important psychologically-charged words to promote a particular point of view or, in the case of psychological warfare, to discredit an enemy. Here Dr. Laibow’s audience is middle-class, health-conscious, intelligent (and somewhat intellectual) Americans.

Here’s the example from Dr. Laibow’s message:

“If you think that your understanding of Codex is being manipulated by words (such as “risk assessment” as a scientific approach of toxicology appropriate to nutrients which are, by definition, non-toxic, for example), distortion (”CAFTA and FTAA have CODEX language in them so they are the same as the CODEX problem”) and distraction (who is a Druid?, who is a witch?, who is “Controlled Opposition”?, who is a CIA Agent?, who is a good person?, who is a bad person?, etc.”) you are right.”

The psychologically-charged words here are “manipulation,” “distortion,” and “distraction.” John Hammell had made the clear connection between CAFTA and Codex, and had accused the Natural Solutions Foundation (Dr. Laibow’s group) and several other organizations of being “controlled opposition groups” – groups taken over by, or owned by, people who appear to be opposed to Codex but who promote useless activism or tell people that there is nothing to worry about. In the above message, Dr. Laibow psychologically marginalizes Hammell’s position, not by refuting it, but by merely using words that do so by their psychological power in our culture among her audience.

Here is another even more dramatic example, from the next paragraph in her message:

“So the infighting and turf wars which have provided this distortion and distraction (and which the Natural Solutions Foundation will not dignify by entering since there is plenty of turf to go around in the world of health freedom) fulfill the role of the bloated and meaningless “news” that keeps us disconnected both from reality and from its meaning.”

Note the lead-in, using the psychologically-charged words “infighting” and “turf wars” before repeating the words “distortion” and “distraction.” She goes on to say that *her* (that is, her follower’s) organization stands above all this (“will not dignify by entering”). Then she goes in for the psychological kill: “bloated and meaningless news” that keeps us “disconnected both from reality and its meaning.” At this point, most readers would be subconsciously and consciously convinced that John Hammell is involving us in “turf wars,” “keeping us disconnected” from reality by distorting the facts and distracting everyone with “bloated and meaningless” news.

Finally, here is the psychological lead-out that puts people into their “comfort zone” knowing that what she has stated above is right and just:

“Read, study, follow the links and make sure that you are comfortable with both what is presented and what is concluded from that. Above all, question your sources and evaluate the answers carefully. I know that I do.

“You won’t always be correct, but you can always be informed. If you are an American, Thomas Jefferson and the founding fathers gave you that opportunity and obligation.”

If people were feeling at all uncomfortable with her subtle attack on Hammell, this puts their minds at ease. Acting as if she had presented unbiased information, she uses the psychologically-charged words and phrases “comfortable,” “question your sources,” and “evaluate the answers carefully.” Then confirming that her audience is intelligent, she reminds them that they “won’t always be correct” but can “always be informed.” Last but not least, she invokes Thomas Jefferson and the founding fathers giving us the “opportunity and obligation” to be informed.

In a similar article using similar psychological techniques, Dr. Laibow convinces readers, using psychologically-charged words such as “forces,” “intentional disinformation,” “misleading,” and “irrelevant” to convince her readers that attempting to stop the multinational treaty process is a waste of time, that instead they need to focus on changing the Codex regulations. Here’s are some excerpts:

“FTAA and CAFTA are really bad ideas for US interests. But all the recent focus in them as related to the CODEX issue because they contain CODEX language is either an error in the understanding of the real nature of the CODEX problem or, worse yet, intentional disinformation to drain off energy and political force from opposition to CODEX ALIMENTARIUS. FTAA and CAFTA are totally irrelevant to the CODEX issue.”

“Some people in the CODEX arena are now focusing on FTAA and CAFTA and saying that it is a waste of time to focus in CODEX because FTAA and CAFTA contain CODEX language in their text. These forces are either using mis- or dis- information by misleading people to think that because these trade agreements contain CODEX language they somehow are a significant part of the Codex problem.”

Dr. Laibow does not reveal that the many Codex committees are all controlled by the multinational agricultural and pharmaceutical companies, so that it is precisely what she is telling people to do – trying to change the Codex regulations – is fruitless. She does not reveal that the Codex regulations themselves, without multinational agreements such as FTAA and CAFTA in place, are just pieces of paper that lack any power.

These are masterful uses of Semantic Differential. Many orators and politicians have mastered this kind of psychological use of words without learning it from Army Intelligence, but one can only wonder where a naturopathic doctor such as Dr. Laibow might have learned to write in this fashion. Perhaps it was from working with her husband, General Albert Stubblebine, former head of the US Army Intelligence & Security Command (INSCOM) 1981-84. Anyone in that position would be steeped in knowledge about psychological warfare techniques and especially about the use of Semantic Differential.

While Dr. Laibow’s activism against the extreme excesses of the pharmaceutical industry appear to be genuine, one can only wonder why she is so intent on marginalizing those who want people to make the connection between Codex and the efforts by these same multinational corporations to enforce the Codex regulations and to place jurisdiction for that enforcement outside of Congress through multinational agreements such as WTO, CAFTA, and FTAA.

Jonathan Campbell
November 4, 2005

References:

Dr. Laibow’s messages and Dr. Laibow’s messages

Reference on Albert Stubblebine: [link removed]

Here is the lying Dr Laibow’s response:

The TRUTH is our Defense…

Confused About the Natural Solutions Foundation?
That’s Exactly What the Other Side Wants!

There is only one defense for libel or slander: the truth. Since the recent
Internet attacks against us contain no truth, they are, by definition, both
libel and slander. Why are they happening? It is really quite simple: Your
ill health is big business (the biggest) and the other side has all the money
it needs to buy disinformation and disinformation agents. So there are agents
provocateur, people who stir up division and trouble on demand, out there
trying to attack the Natural Solutions Foundation. We are the largest and far
and away the most successful health freedom organization in the world.

And then there are what Lenin called “useful idiots”, people who unwittingly
do the work of the tyrannizers. Sadly, health freedom has both in abundance.

Note: A negative can not be proven (I am NOT this, I have NOT done that), but
such accusations are made about us not because they are true, but because they
can be made to SOUND true, made to appear plausible through the Big Lie
techniques of disinformation.

We get attacked all the time, notably when we are RIGHT on target. This go
around is no exception.

If you haven’t encountered the latest attacks, good. Ignore this. If you
have encountered them, ignore the attacks. Here’s why:

Fact from Rima E. Laibow, MD: I am not now and have never been associated with
the CIA, Big Pharma, the US Government except as a tax payer and a citizen,
the New World Order or any of its faces, or any other force trying to control
you or me. I act as I see fit and say what I believe to be true based on the
best of my information and knowledge. Period. Natural Solutions Foundation is
so effective in our opposition to the Powers That Be that a serious attempt
was apparently made on my life a year ago. We have been met with guns at the
Codex meeting to keep us under guard and away from the other attendees and
delegates. We have been threatened by representatives of the industries and
agencies whose agendas we oppose. We have been attacked directly by the
Chairman of Codex from the Podium during a Codex meeting and Dr. Barbara
Schneeman, the US Codex Representative at a recent Codex meeting actually told
members of our pro-health nations’ delegates to stay away from us since we
“got things wrong” and that they, the developing world, should come to HER,
instead, for answers to their questions and concerns! The members of the
developing nations’ delegations came running to me roaring with laughter after
these conversations! I would say that we are pretty clearly UNcontrolled
opposition, and pretty good at it, too!

Fact from General Stubblebine: I am the Foundation’s President. I retired
from Active Duty in 1984. Before that, my operational commander was the
Deputy Director of the CIA and I held all clearances of which I was aware
although I now know that there were others that I did not hold. I continued
to work as a Defense Contractor until 1992 or so and retired from that
business. At that time, I allowed ALL my security clearances to lapse and
have no more access to classified, sensitive or other restricted data than you
do. Dr. Rima has no clearances of any kind and has neither applied for any
nor been given any.

Fact from the Trustees of the Natural Solutions Foundation: We do not
individually or as an organization care if Keven Miller makes one or a
thousand films of any length. The film was commissioned to provide the center
of a public relations storm starting 6 weeks before the Codex meeting later
that year. That would have meant a release date of April 15, 2005. We were
compelled to sue him for failure to meet his contractual obligations because
the mother who mortgaged her house in order to pay for the film which the
Foundation commissioned opposing the Vitamin and Mineral Guideline, slated for
ratification on July 4, 2005 requested a refund when the film was not
forthcoming as promised on April 15, 2005. Miller did not produce the film in
a timely fashion, releasing it on June 29, 2005, far too late to accomplish
its public relations goal and did not make the film for which he had been
contracted. We requested the donor’s money back. After a legal proceeding,
Miller agreed to a settlement in which he paid back the money under terms
which the settlement prevents either Miller or our side from disclosing.
Miller defaulted on those payments but the family chose not to pursue him at
this time since they felt it was throwing good money after bad.

Fact from the Trustees of the Natural Solutions Foundation: The Natural
Solutions Foundation accept NO corporate sponsorship. One hundred percent of
its funding comes either from the money that General Stubblebine and Dr. Rima
put into it (our life savings and the proceeds from the sale of our lovely
home in Westchester, NY in 2007) or what private donors donate. We work for
free, take no salary, compensation, or other benefit from the Foundation and,
instead, pay for any expense shortfall with our dwindling resources. Council
Ralph Fucetola, JD devotes at least half time every month on the same basis.
Our other staff are similarly all volunteer. Where is the profit? Where is
the misuse of funds? Every penny goes into the work of the Foundation. We
provide the overhead, the office, the ink, the internet, the paper, the time
and the skill to run it. There are no salaries to drain the impact of your
donations. None.

Fact from General Stubblebine: I am NOT the illusory violent, abusive,
alcoholic, “CIA Agent” father of a multiply hospitalized paranoid
schizophrenic “activist” whose charges hit the Internet and then reverberate
to his glee and our undeserved discredit, despite the bizarre letters we, and
others have received to that effect. Nor have I ever stared a goat (or
anything else) to death, nor has he tried to do so. I did, while on active
duty, learn about the purported human capacity to do so and brought the idea
that it might be possible to Fort Bragg, home of the Special Forces, with
which I have no connection. I never heard what happened to the technology
thereafter.

Facts from General Stubblebine and Rima E. Laibow, MD:
General Stubblebine: I have never had any connection, part in, knowledge
about, or dealings with the Mind Control program. I believed, until he met
Dr. Rima in 1991, that the program had been stopped following the demand of
Congress that MK Ultra and other Mind Control programs cease immediately.
Anyone making these assertions has no idea how compartmentalization and
clearances work: the need to know determines what you know. I was in
Strategic Intelligence and had no need to know, so I was never “read into” any
Mind Control Program.

Fact from Rima E. Laibow, MD: I knew that the Mind Control programs had continued because as a
psychiatrist and social activist I had been introduced to a number of people
who claimed the same events/conditioning/torture had happened to each of them.
The similarity attracted my attention and I learned a great deal about the
Mind Control programs. In fact, long before I met General Stubblebine, a
Congressional Staffer friend brought data and people to me to evaluate whether
these people had, in fact, been subjected to Mind Control techniques and asked
me if I thought the subject was worth another round of Congressional Hearings.
I was able, through this documentation, to convince the highly skeptical
General Stubblebine in 1991-2 that this program had continued after Congress
ordered it disbanded.

Fact from Rima E. Laibow, MD : I have never administered, supervised or been
associated with electroshock or electroconvulsive (ECT) therapy in any form.
I turned down a fine position with a major University hospital because I would
have been forced to either administer or supervise ECT and I am unwilling to
do that for any reason. I have spent my entire career in psychiatry and
medicine using non-drug treatments rather than drug ones. For example, when I
was asked to take over an in patient psychiatric ward for children and
adolescents in Connecticut, I took every child and teen ager in the ward off
drugs. The administration of the hospital and the insurance companies
protested vigorously, but the children got better and the horrific behaviors
and side effects (read, “brain damage” caused by the drugs) diminished
significantly.

Fact from General Stubblebine and Rima E. Laibow, MD: It makes no difference
whether General Stubblebine and I were lovers before his divorce! (DUH!) The
assertions of an angry spouse during divorce proceeding in 1994 are neither
accurate nor relevant. I would say our detractors are scraping all the way
through the bottom of the barrel and into the dirt below if this is what they
need to uses to damage us. Shame!

Fact from the Trustees of the Natural Solutions Foundation : We are not using
high pressure tactics to separate people from their money, IRAs or 401s. The
government of the United States is about to do just that and we have a
legitimate and helpful humanitarian project in Panama which can accept these
funds. The Valley of the Moon Eco(TM) Demonstration Community project, part
of our International Decade of Nutrition, is a sustainable farm, farm school,
natural medical center, etc., offers people many reasons to become a part of
it. Those who are interested can learn more and decide whether or not it is
for them. Others can ignore it.

Fact from Council Ralph Fucetola, JD: I was asked by one of the attackers to
advise her in the medical board hearings which ultimately cost her medical
license in the same state in which Dr. Rima is licensed. Despite claims to
the contrary, I did not know her when she lost custody of her child. Nor did
I “abandon” her during the hearings. Once she was advised that to regain
her license she would have to seek psychiatric help she did not, to our
knowledge, retain me or another attorney to assist her and remains de-licensed
to this day.

The truth is that these detractors, whatever their mental status and their
motivation, would add much, much more to the battle for health freedom by
actually accomplishing something rather than attacking those who are
accomplishing it! If they can behave like adults, they are welcome to join
us. We have NEVER attacked anyone and will not. We will, however, take
whatever steps we need to in order to protect health freedom and our
well-deserved reputations, as we did when we sued Miller to get back the
donor’s money. These false statements and innuendos must cease and desist.

Had enough of this? Good. let’s move on. You can join with us by going to [link removed]
and joining our Health Freedom Action eAlert mailing
list.

If you really want more details about these detractors, just click here:
 [link removed]

If you want to look at our accomplishments, however, see:
 [link removed]

Please consider making your most generous end-of-the-year gift.

We really need your support now more than ever:
 [link removed]

This coming year we’ll need your help in Divesting the FDA of food regulatory power, forcing the FTC to prevent all vaccination advertising until vaccines are proven to be safe and effective, continuing to build the “Coalition of the Unwilling” to challenge Codex’ (and the FDA’s) “Weaponization of food”, preventing more children from neurologic damage through more mandatory vaccines, working for a ban on GMOs and a host of other urgent Health Freedom issues…

Yours in health and freedom,

Dr. Rima

JOHN BEST JUNIOR as FORESAM

And so goes yet another ally!

When will he learn?

I wrote something last year about my problems with my son biting himself that drew lots of interest. I notice that many people still read this entry and, I hope, the useful suggestions that people submitted.

It seems I have solved the problem, finally. My son has only had a couple of minor, short-lived instances of biting himself in the past month.

I don’t offer my solution as a complete answer for anyone else who has to deal with this nightmare but what helped my son may help others.

We have done 75 rounds of chelation to remove mercury and aluminum which resulted in much improved behavior and mental awareness. Chelation alone did not decrease the biting though. It was not until we began addressing the possibility that the liver needed some help that the biting diminished and is now virtually gone.

For my son, all we added to his supplememnt regimen was more milk thistle, more fish oil, vitamin D, increased vitamin E and acidophilus to control yeast. I found the suggestion to add these supplements amongst a treatment protocol designed to improve liver function for those with cirrhosis. There was much more to it as designed for cirrhosis so I added one supplement at a time until the behavior seemed to diminish. It worked. So, I offer this as a possible problem to address that should be checked with an MD to determine which supplements may be most likely to improve liver function to a point that will relieve the child of some pain and resolve the biting problem.

JOHN BEST JUNIOR as FORESAM

With the exception of the ongoing chelation, Best would have helped his son a lot more if he’d pursued the symptomatic line a lot sooner. It’s why I state that he has neglected him. He was all about “This is Autism causing this so I must cure Autism”. A most obvious panic based trap and he fell into it.

Yeast has been long recognised as connected to the self biting issue – just to back the comment about neglect up.

Tom Daschle asked me to host a community meeting to help the Obama administration learn how to fix healthcare. So, I decided to ask the autism community to let Mr Daschle hear our concerns on a blog. That way, we have a public record of it and don’t have to take notes with shorthand.

While any issue regarding healthcare is open here, Mr Daschle specifically mentioned looking at prevention, and managing chronic care. Many of us share the same opinions about how to prevent autism and other vaccine induced neurological horrors and some may also be able to help the Obama administration come up with effective policies on managing long-term care. I’ll leave it at that and hope some people will comment for Mr Daschle. For purposes of understanding who is commenting, there will be no anonymous comments allowed, pick some sort of name please.

JOHN BEST JUNIOR as FORESAM

I have been told that this contact that was made by Mr Daschle was generic and not personal as such. Virtually everyone involved in advocacy and so forth got one of these messages.

No biggie – and no one responded on the blog to this request.

Here’s the link to the page below on Change.gov. It would be nice if enough people voted for this to knock an inane idea like mandating that Esperanto be taught in schools out of the top spot. You have to register, then respond to an email that they send you to vote.

Accept and Sign ” The Autism Reform Act of 2009″
As a country we have watched Autism Spectrum Disorders grow in a devastating number. Over the last decade it has spiraled so quickly out of control that: 1.) There must not just be one person but an ENTIRE U.S. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE for Educating Children with Autism. 2.) The use of Time Out Rooms, Corporal punishments, Restraints, and the high amount of Abuse must be monitored with severe penalties to states and fines or conviction of those that break such a REFORM Law. 3.) School Districts/States must each have an ” Office of Autism Education Compliance or be subject to loss of Federal Funding. 4.) Due Process Hearing Officers must NOT be employees of the state and shall be employed by the Federal Government ONLY. 5.) Insurance companies MUST provide the Early Interventions such as ABA Discreet Trial at no cost to parents. 6.) Protection and Advocacy MUST be funded properly to allow parents that need help get it without any more then a 15 day waiting period.7.) Grants for research, education, and non profit organizations for those with Autism Spectrum Disorders must be made in the amount of 5 billion dollars.8.) Relief for parents who have paid out of pocket to educate their children must be made swiftly with 100% reimbursement. 9.) Behavior Intervention Plans must accompany all Individual Education Plans.10.) Insurance companies must make available all resources for children and adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders including but not limited to any items deemed necessary by the physician for the treatment of metal toxicities and any other theraputic orders their physician may order. 11.) The Autism Reform Act shall consider all Autism Spectrum Disorders including Aspergers. 12.) This Reform Act must be ‘open’ for additions as needed and create a 12 parent panel to propose such additions.

– Michael Robinson (Founder The Office of Advocacy) Dec 09 @ 01:40AM PST

JOHN BEST JUNIOR as FORESAM

1.) There must not just be one person but an ENTIRE U.S. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE for Educating Children with Autism.

Good move.

2.) The use of Time Out Rooms, Corporal punishments, Restraints, and the high amount of Abuse must be monitored with severe penalties to states and fines or conviction of those that break such a REFORM Law.

They must be banned outright for those on the Spectrum.

3.) School Districts/States must each have an ” Office of Autism Education Compliance or be subject to loss of Federal Funding.

Good move.

4.) Due Process Hearing Officers must NOT be employees of the state and shall be employed by the Federal Government ONLY.

Good move.

5.) Insurance companies MUST provide the Early Interventions such as ABA Discreet Trial at no cost to parents.

Not ABA unless the aversive techniques are banned first.

6.) Protection and Advocacy MUST be funded properly to allow parents that need help get it without any more then a 15 day waiting period.

15 days is too long. It must be 7 days at the absolute maximum due to the panic that exists.

7.) Grants for research, education, and non profit organizations for those with Autism Spectrum Disorders must be made in the amount of 5 billion dollars.

Okay, but ONLY if this doesn’t assist the fools who believe in 100 percent bio-medical treatment and unproven theories like mercury in vaccines and so forth. Do NOT approve grants for example to Defeat Autism Now and Generation Rescue.

8.) Relief for parents who have paid out of pocket to educate their children must be made swiftly with 100% reimbursement.

Good move, but a fresh curriculum must also be added.

9.) Behavior Intervention Plans must accompany all Individual Education Plans.

Good move as long as that plan is NOT aversive.

10.) Insurance companies must make available all resources for children and adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders including but not limited to any items deemed necessary by the physician for the treatment of metal toxicities and any other theraputic orders their physician may order.

No I oppose this as a matter of principle because the wording insinuates that regular doctors can do something in the first instance. They can’t. This must be focussed on psychology in the first instance and not regular doctors.

11.) The Autism Reform Act shall consider all Autism Spectrum Disorders including Aspergers.

EXCELLENT move!

12.) This Reform Act must be ‘open’ for additions as needed and create a 12 parent panel to propose such additions.

Not parents. The panel must include at least 4 adults who are on the Spectrum themselves. You shouldn’t go with a panel that would be no better than the Autism Speaks board.

This whole idea is a step in the right direction, but flaws exist that must be rectified.

I was going to email this to the website, but I just didn’t have time to.

Kristina Chew, a sadistic psychopath with a PhD has offered us her deranged opinion on the murder of Jacon Grabe by his father.

The Denver Post has the facts the led up to the child’s murder.

Autism is a maddening disorder of scrambled brain development that can lead some parents to snap, experts say. Autistic children suffer abuse and are killed at higher rates than normal children. Studies have shown that about 20 percent of autistic children are abused, compared with about 1 percent of other children. Those who deal with the disorder place the abuse even higher.

“Our organization answers about 150 calls per month. We listen to the issues. As a result, I think there may be more,” said Betty Lehman, director of the Autism Society of Colorado and the mother of an autistic son.

“It is so debilitating on entire families. For many families there comes a time when they can’t take another minute of it,” she said. “Even the most serene and loving parent in the world has a breaking point with this.”

Here’s how Professor Chew sums up the murder:

And, too, constant reference to autism as that “maddening order” due to “scrambled brain development” does a real disservice—even harm—-to the public understanding of autism, as do suggestions that autism is caused by “toxins,” or that autistic children are somehow “poisoned” and “damaged.” No one’s denying that it’s not easy to raise an autistic or disabled child—-but we all need to be a little more careful with our language.

Chew, an associate of the cult of Neurodiversity, calls the truth about the horror of autism a disservice. She does not miss the opportunity to state that letting people know that autism is caused by poisons contained in vaccines is also a disservice. A child is dead and our Professor Chew is worried about language that is used to describe how poisons from vaccines scramble children’s brains.

The Denver Post got it right, we all have our breaking points. With autism, the inevitable conclusion that parents will arrive at is that they can not die. For, to die is to leave the fate of your autistic child to the hands of the same idiots who allowed the child to become autistic, the government who ordered him to be poisoned with vaccines. As a parent, you weigh the options. Do you leave your kid to suffer at the hands of the government for a lifetime or do you end the suffering?

Under these circumstances, the murder is understandable. If you see your child’s future as nothing but torment, pain and horror, you’re doing the kid a favor by killing him. There are other options but people like Professor Chew don’t want anyone to know about those options. Chew contributes to the disinformation that caused this murder when she tries to absolve thimerosal as the primary cause of autism.

Jacob Grabe’s father made a couple of bad decisions here. Perhaps he was not aware that his son’s autism was caused by vaccines. If he had known and had gone to authorities to report the poisoning, they would not have done anything. They would not have arrested the CEO of any vaccine manufacturers and charged them with the crime of poisoning his son. They would not have given him the antidote. If that had happened, the next logical step would be to take the law into your own hands and murder the CEO yourself. That’s what I would like to do, take a machine gun and shoot everyone involved with this mass poisoning of children. I’d start with Congress. The only problem with that though, is that after some cops gunned me down, my son would still be alive and would still spend his life suffering at the hands of some other politicians who would replace them.

So, where does that leave you? If you listen to Kristina Chew, you’re just supposed to take it, don’t kill the CEO’s and politicians who allow the poisoning to continue and don’t put your kid out of his misery. The problem with Chew’s logic is that not everyone can take it. People do break. I expect that if the world was told that our medical experts were causing this scrambled brain syndrome known as autism that someone would, in fact, go berserk with a machine gun and kill as many of those who cause the problem as possible. It would certainly be justified and I would applaud their decision. In fact, I think it would be nice if every father of an autistic child armed themselves and walked into the Capitol building together and started shooting. This act would not be lost on future politicians.

The thing Chew will not tell you about autism is that we can cure it. That gives righteously angry parents other options than mass murder or child murder. There is the possibility that the scrambled brains caused by vaccines can be unscrambled. This doesn’t change the fact that somebody should kill the people who did this to our kids but it does allow us to possibly repair the damage. If we can repair our children’s scrambled brains, we can then die and expect that our kids will be able to care for themselves.

Chew and her associates from Neurodiversity cause the murders of autistic children with their bogus rhetoric against curing the horror. I wonder what Chew will do when her son grows a little older and larger and she can no longer care for him. Will she put him in a facility where he will be watered and fed, to vegetate for the rest of his life or will she end the kid’s suffering? She won’t help the poor kid by trying to cure him so we’ll have to wait and see what happens.

Perhaps Chew will be like other cognitively challenged mothers and lie to herself that the “home” is a good place for her son to spend his life, locked up. Maybe she’ll skip the home and just croak with no plans made for the kid. Then the kid can wander the streets. If he’s like my autistic son, unable to talk or toilet himself, that wouldn’t be a pretty picture thinking of him wandering around naked after he dropped his diaper. The cops would probably beat him too when they arrested him, and beat him some more when he refused to talk to them. Then the cops would beat him again when he smeared feces in his jail cell that they would have to clean up. Imagine the beating he would get if he put his feces covered hands on the cops.

I think we should look at Kristina’s wise words of advice one more time about how to deal with autism: “…but we all need to be a little more careful with our language.” Yes Kristina, watching our language will certainly help our children. What a moron I must be for thinking there are other actions that can be taken.

JOHN BEST JUNIOR as FORESAM (This entry has been deleted from Hating Autism but is preserved here and it’s reproduction is true and correct)

I left the following message on Kristina’s blog;

The bottom line on this – as already mentioned – is support. The health system (in particular the mental health system) must be better funded. Parents like these need to be educated and supported through the tough times. The mercury militia blame other things and are a threat to the needed support structure.

Frankly, the US needs universal health care across the board so everyone can access it and then the support can be provided to show that Autism is NOT all of the things the Denver Post has made it out to be. Difficult yes – but not impossible.

Alex Grape – you are a failure as a father because you gave up.

America – you failed Alex Grape because you allowed him to give up (and that’s not an excuse for what he did by the way).

Best as usual is trying to garner support for the father. Why support someone who gave up? Why tolerate a breaking point like this? Best is saying more than he realises here – given that he himself has posted in the past about euthanasia!!

There shouldn’t be a breaking point. Support, people! Let’s get in there and give the parents some respite. Let’s get in there and provide the education needed. Give access to psychologists who know what they are dealing with and know the tricks to unlock the Spectrum mind that is presently closed. A parent who tries to make an Autistic communicate with them is a failure. A parent should make the effort to communicate on the child’s terms. That’s how the Spectrum works. It’s like learning a different language – and as it’s your own child we’re talking about there’s no excuse not to make that effort.

And there is certainly no excuse to take the life of a child.

Here’s a chance to tell Obama about the horror of autism. Someone here is moderating comments so, at least we know they are reading them. This is an opportunity to flood this site with comments about how we are curing our autistic children and to ask Obama to stop the poisoning of our babies.

JOHN BEST JUNIOR as FORESAM

There were two discussions that I could find and one of them is closed. Over 3000 comments. The active one has over 4000 and I don’t have time to go through them.

What I will be doing though as a result of this – if I have time before Christmas – is to write a letter to the administration and tell them of the mercury militia and what they are trying to do. It will have to be carefully worded and I’ll also have to warn them about the possibility of Best writing to them and trying to discredit me.

While I’m about it – I’ll tell them about universal health care.

Here’s the link to Dr Woeller’s site. As you can see below, for almost $500, you can look at Woeller’s site.

Group Status: Open to All
Membership Criteria: None
Full Access Membership: $37.00 per month or $397.00 per year paid in advance
New Full Member Fee (one time): $97.00

Woeller seems to have it all figured out on his website for us so that he can have the site take care of the patients for him while he pockets $500. You can download prescription forms and all you have to do is bring it to a real live doctor for a signature. Of course, you have to pay the live doc for an office visit, maybe $80 for the minute it takes him to sign the form plus the cost of the prescription or lab work. Meanwhile, Woeller has your $500 for letting his site direct you to a live doctor. I wonder if I could find a live doctor by looking in the Yellow pages for less money?

I usually go here without paying $500 for the same information, maybe better. It would cost me $134 just to look at anything Woeller has to say to find out what kind of protocol he advises for chelation. So, I can’t say if his advice is any good or not. It doesn’t look like you can pay for Woeller’s advice by having an insurance company pay for your membership to his site so it’s probably much cheaper to see an actual live doctor who insurance might pay for. The last time I saw a DAN doctor, I think it cost me $300 but he could sign prescriptions in person and tell me what I needed to know without having to go see someone else at greater expense later.

Kurt Woeller, you’re a real (beep!)ing humanitarian, aren’t you? Wow, only $500 to learn what we can find for free all over the internet…dirtbag.

Someone came here to defend Dr Woeller. Some simple arithmetic shows that if he enlisted as many members as the Autism Mercury group (almost 8,000), Dr Woeller could grab himself about $800,000 just for allowing people to join his site. That does not include the monthly fees. That does not sound like a humanitarian motive to me.

JOHN BEST JUNIOR as FORESAM

Best is ignoring the real problem here. The concept of taking advantage of a panic. A panic that would not exist if all the information and support was out there.

I agree that on face value, this guy is ripping people off. But as Best has said himself – we won’t know unless we spend the $134 USD to begin with.

This is a free market at work, people. Best should get with the right solution – and support universal health care instead of whining within his own little messed psych.

I read an interesting post at Age of Autism today about how Paul Offit’s book may contain lies that are associated with Kathleen Seidel, a well known liar who slanders as many people as possible who help autistic children.

This is interesting to me because it was written by JB Handley who claimed he was not involved with the Age of Autism operations when I questioned him about some strange goings on there last fall. I had asked Mr Handley about Kim Stagliano’s decision to delete my comments about Amanda Baggs while Stagliano allowed a couple of neurodiverse idiots to perform a public character assassination on me at Age of Autism. All of sudden, after my exchange with Mr Handley, I was contacted by Stagliano who went through a long rigamarole of playing dumb and avoiding the issue before finally agreeing to delete a comment by Anne Bevington that assassinated my character. This was about a month after the comment had been made so, I doubt anyone ever saw it. And, of course, Stagliano did not repost my comment that she had deleted.

Later, Dan Olmsted and David Kirby had supported Kathleen Seidel’s right to say whatever she wanted about people who try to help autistic children. This fit right in with Kim Stagliano allowing neurodiverse nitwits to bash Rescue Angels who tried to refute the neurodiverse lies.

Throughout the course of his involvement with autism, it should be noted that Kirby has stood firm in his refusal to state the obvious, that thimerosal causes autism. Is this a form of disinformation? What’s wrong with a guy who writes a book expounding on all sorts of evidence that points to thimerosal as the cause of autism but keeps saying that maybe it has something to do with autism. How does it play in the media when the guy who wrote the book is so wishy-washy about stating obvious facts? Doesn’t that make everyone who blames thimerosal for their kids’ autism look like idiots by having this guy speak for them?

Now, in spite of Olmsted and Kirby defending Seidel’s right to bash parents, and Stagliano allowing it to happen on the Age of Autism blog, along comes Mr Handley insinuating that he wants to sue Seidel, or Paul Offit, or both for making false statements about people. This would seem to be in conflict with those who run the Age of Autism and their defense of Mrs Seidel and other assorted nitwits from Neurodiversity.

So, what’s the truth here? Does Age of Autism support people who try to cure autism and help children or do they support Seidel and her nitwits? Shouldn’t Handley also want to sue Stagliano for allowing Seidel’s nitwits to bash Rescue Angels on the Age of Autism blog? If Handley wants to go after Offit and Seidel for bashing Rescue Angels, one would think he would take a stance about Kirby and Olmsted supporting Seidel.

Yes, I was a Rescue Angel when Stagliano allowed Amanda Baggs’ lawyer to assassinate my character without allowing me a chance to clear my name when she deleted my reply. Mr Handley never said a word about that. So, I guess it’s OK for Stagliano to bash Rescue Angels but not Paul Offit. Does that make Stagliano a disinformation agent who supports giving out false information about autism? Does it make Handley a disinformation agent by ignoring it?

Generation Rescue may do some good for the autism community but it makes us all look bad when it allows people like Stagliano, who are allegedly on the same side, to take sides with Neurodiversity as Olmsted and Kirby did. One would think all Rescue Angels would receive the same support when Neurodiversity assassinates their character. How about it J.B., do you want my deposition against Stagliano so you can sue her too? Does anyone wonder why I quit being a Rescue Angel with this sort of support?

How come Olmsted and Stagliano allow Handley to write things opposed to Kathleen Seidel on Age of Autism? Isn’t this contrary to their stance of allowing Neurodiversity to smear anyone they choose? Whose side is Age of Autism on here? I wonder if they will state whether they oppose Neurodiversity or not? Does Age of Autism support Rescue Angels and Generation Rescue? Does Handley support all Rescue Angels or only the ones who Stagliano approves of? Is Stagliano a Rescue Angel? Is she a member of Neurodiversity?

JOHN BEST JUNIOR as FORESAM (This entry has been deleted from Hating Autism but is preserved here and it’s reproduction is true and correct)

It never ceases to amaze me.

Whenever someone who is more or less on the same side of the argument as Best is turns around and says something that Best sees as wrong – he’s like a whining spoilt brat. Wah wah wah! “Do it my way or you’re an idiot”. He needs his nappy changed quick smart!

The point is Handley and the others know that brow beating and all that doesn’t work. It’s a lesson that McCarthy still needs to learn and she gets away with it because of her “name”. They still hold the views, but because they aren’t vicious and aggressive – Best fawns them off as no good to the cause.

And yet when the same tactic is fired back at him (tit for tat) he hates it. And that’s the root reason why I do it. If he dishes it out, he has to expect to get it back – and with interest.

Best has forgotten that when he was a Rescue Angel, his attitude wrecked the organisation even without it’s stupid line. These people are starting to realise that science isn’t backing them up – something that Best is yet to admit to (and probably never will). That’s the real explanation.

More and more enemies for Best. He’s an exception to the following rule – enemies create themselves. He’s made more enemies that I ever could, and my enemies were never created by me. The man’s a raving nut. A dodo brain as Lee delightfully put it on my forum. And soon to be extinct I think!

I think this challenge should be sent to every doctor who gives vaccines and causes autism.

$10,000 CHALLENGE IS NOW DR. MOULDEN’S “LIFE AND LIBERTY” CHALLENGE

Dr. Carley has offered a $10,000 reward for any vaccine promoter to come on her internet radio show and refute the documents she has authored. No one has stepped forward to do so. Dr. Carley has been qualified in court as an expert witness in VIDS, Legal Abuse Syndrome, Vaccinology, and child abuse.

Dr. Carley’s challenge is now buttressed with Dr Moulden’s proof causation of vaccine induced brain injury, and the mechanism(s) of action in physiology, that has been causing the adverse health consequences from vaccines.

Dr. Moulden, who also subscribes to the Hippocratic Oath of “first do no harm”, now stands beside Dr. Carley and issues the following challenge to the medical experts:

“I am so confident of the cause-effect mechanisms I can now see, and show, which proves brain injury within several hours (sometimes days and weeks) of vaccination, that I offer my life and liberty if I am shown to be wrong…I have no fears, because I am right, and now I can let you see the truth with your own eyes.”

Will any of the “vaccines are entirely safe” experts accept this challenge? Some have said “infants can handle upwards of 10,000 vaccines safely.”

If Dr. Paul Offit (a vaccine expert) is so 100% confident that the vaccines are so safe, for so many people, then the public should demand that he face-off, in public forum, with Dr. Moulden (a brain and neurodevelopment expert). In a 60 minute “show-down” let the public decide the truth for themselves and let the public decide what to do with the one who was/is lying and/or is wrong. You will KNOW the truth within the first half-hour.

JOHN BEST JUNIOR as FORESAM

Why should Paul Offit debate a crank? Why even give this any attention? The fact that vaccines are dependent on how they are used makes this a moot point, because Moulden could pull a misuse out of his arse and the debate would be off target like a shot.

I’m on the verge of getting in touch with the Canadian government about this idiot. He should be gagged. If only I had the time.