David Andrews, psychologist, had this to say when asked about a recent court ruling about autism. This is a man who works as an educational psychologist with children in Kotka, Finland. I wonder if he uses the same language when working with the children.
JOHN BEST JUNIOR as FORESAM
7:54 PM
David N. Andrews MEd (Distinction) said…
Mint, abfh! Totally mint!
JBJr’s not gonna be a happy bunny but (beep!) him and his idiot friends!
Here, Amdrews offers an opinion on President Obama
11:07 AM
David N. Andrews MEd (Distinction) said…
He is a racist bastard! LoL
Here is Andrews opinion upon learning how to cure autism.
3:40 AM
David N. Andrews MEd (Distinction) said…
“You are one (beep!)ed up individual.”
We can see from this that Andrews can’t understand the science involved here.
Next, Amdrews talks about his relationship with his daughter:9:42 AM
David N. Andrews MEd (Distinction) said…
As for the intluence I am on my daughter, I have a letter from an eminent child psychologist in the UK, who testifies to the fact that my ex-wife and I are…(beep!)ing cruel and disgusting.
Here we see how Andrews advises a parent of an autistic child on financial matters
8:51 AM
David N. Andrews MEd (Distinction) said…
You dopey old chavvy sod!
LoL
More professional advice from the psychologist, Andrews.4:59 PM
David N. Andrews MEd (Distinction) said…
But you manage to (beep!) so much up purely because of your being a total arsehole, and that’s the sad thing! You talk so much bollocks that you can’t be taken seriously. So get the (beep!) over it and start thinking properly.
Here is Andrews responding to another question about how to treat autism.
6:59 PM
David N. Andrews MEd (Distinction) said…
(beep!)ing Norah, Prepuce!!! Is that really the best you can do? Even when someone tells you that you actually make at least something of a good point? (beep!)ing hell fire – you’re a lousy bollocks, aren’t you?
This is how Andrews tries to help people who were abused as children:
3:18 AM
David N. Andrews MEd (Distinction) said…
Who can win with a (beep!)ing crybaby like you? And – quite frankly – have you ever had a (beep!)ing beating you did not deserve? All those beatings with rosaries that you claimed the nuns used to give you… you know why? Because you (beep!)ing deserved every one of them, Prepuce!
An example of how Andrews treats senior citizens: 8:51 AM
David N. Andrews MEd (Distinction) said…
Holy Shitting Jesus!!!! The Ugly Chav Git-Wizzard is back… and he’s forgotten to put his teeth in!
I’ve already published on that elsewhere. Not that you’d understand it, UglyChavGit-Wizzard. Beyond your ability to understand.
1:44 PM
David N. Andrews MEd (Distinction) said…
Ugly Twat
Bullshit, you ignorant tosser. It’s not whether I can prove they don’t exist: you make the claim, you prove the claim! If you can’t prove the claim, you can’t make the claim stick. What bit of basi logic do you not get, you brain-dead arsehole?
10:14 AM
David N. Andrews MEd (Distinction) said…
The (beep!)-Ugly Chavvy Git-Wizzard speaks Not to me it isn’t. Smearing shit is not a sign of being autistic.
LoL – you’re just (beep!)ing jealous, you crozzled old ugly shit.
4:25 PM
David N. Andrews MEd (Distinction) said…
SHUT THE (beep!) UP! You’re getting monotonous.
Andrews’ scholarly opinion on the autism epidemic:
5:53 PM
David N. Andrews MEd (Distinction) said…
What (beep!)ing epidemic???? LoL
There is no (beep!)ing epidemic!!!
Don’t be so (beep!)ing alarmist and so bleeding stupid! Holy (beep!)ing bollocks!
I couldn’t gave a dead rat’s (beep!)ing crozzled-up bollock what you do or don’t give a (beep!) about, you idiot! HAVEN’T YOU SUSSED THAT OUT YET????
Want me to believe that? Okay … go on… (beep!)ing PROVE IT!
That, else shut the (beep!) up!
But I agree… basically, he should…shut the (beep!) up, and piss off.
From this, we can only hope most psychologists from Finland are slightly better educated than Mr Andrews. It doesn’t seem very professional for psychologists to be ranting like this on blogs that are run by sadists who favor abusing disabled children.
As usual, Best has twisted the meaning away from reality – and he’s done it on his own blog where he feels safe. The man proves yet again that he’s a bona fide coward. A correction of the public record is required;
1. The claim of racism against Barack Obama
Nice try, Best – but David was talking about YOU! This comment was in response to Best wanting Obama out of the Whitehouse.
2. The claim of curing Autism
Sure, Best. You didn’t present any science to understand to cause that comment. You only side swiped Laura Tsconik and the fact that she tried to get your blog deleted. That’s scientific?
3. The relationship with his daughter
This was snipped deliberately. The correct comment was “who testifies to the fact that my ex-wife and I are in fact both very good parents to our child.” The rest of that came from the end of that paragraph – referring to Best’s parenting.
4. Financial matters
This comment was in reference to what Best describes as good financial advice – betting on horse races!! Make of that what you will.
5. Professional advice
This comment had nothing to do with advice. It was a statement of fact simply because Best told him to “worry about Finland” – a proxy for “get out of this argument”. Which of course David rightly wouldn’t do.
6. How to treat Autism
This comment was in response to Best accusing David of spreading false information about Autism – which of course is a lie. Best is the one that is spreading false information – and I actually said that on the blog concerned as well.
7. Helping people “abused” as children
Let’s put this in context. Best was talking proudly of how he’d taught his son how to fight to defend himself, and mockingly laughed off the idea of “crying for help”. Teaching an Autistic child to fight is stupid without additional education (which Best is not doing). Funny this. Best is the one abusing a child – his own! David’s comment was appropriate under the circumstances.
8. Treating senior citizens
Oh so Best is claiming to be a senior citizen now? Each of these comments were aimed squarely at him. Best is not even 60 yet (he’s in his mid 50’s). I wonder if he’s claiming welfare on these grounds?
9. Opinion on the Autism “epidemic”
Well this was spot on – when one takes into account that David was absolutely right on every point, and Best was wrong to the same extent.
As far as the professionalism of David Andrews goes, Best is yet to realise that he drags the level of the debate down and both David and myself (and Cube Demon) are quite happy to take him on at that level. If the level of the debate was up at a professional level Best couldn’t handle it. Because he wouldn’t have the ability to understand it. This is why he posted this repost – so he can say what he wants and not be held responsible for his words within that environment.
That’s why I set up this forum. So that piece of cowardice is rightly punished.
